• About

Silver Wolf Wushu

~ Special martial arts for special needs

Silver Wolf Wushu

Monthly Archives: August 2016

Japanese Heavy and Light Cruisers

04 Thursday Aug 2016

Posted by silverwolfwushu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Japanese heavy cruisers, Japanese light cruisers

Note that the Imperial Japanese Navy built eight battlecruisers between 1907 and 1915. Four were in use at the start of World War II: Hiei, Kirishima, Haruna and Kongo. The first two were sunk in November 1942.

By year of commission

Year                            Heavy cruiser                             Light cruiser

1944                                                                                Ioshima, Sakawa, Yasoshima

1943                                                                                Noshiro, Oyodo, Yahagi

1942                                                                                Agano

1941                                                                                 Kashii (*)

1940                                                                                 Katori (*), Kashima (*)

1939                            Chikuma

1938                             Tone

1937                             Kumano, Suzuya

1935                             Mikuma, Mogami

1932                             Atago, Chokai, Maya, Takao

1929                             Ashigara, Haguro, Miyoko

1928                             Nachi

1927                             Aoba, Kinugasa

1926                             Furutaka, Kako

1925                                                                              Abukuma, Jintsu, Naka

1924                                                                              Sendai

1923                                                                               Isuzu, Yubari, Yura

1922                                                                               Kinu, Nagara, Natori

1921                                                                               Kiso, Kitakami, Oi, Tama

1920                                                                               Kuma

1919                                                                                Tatsuta, Tenryu

  • = built as headquarters and training ships as opposed to combat vessels.
  • Note that the Ioshima was actually a recycling of the Chinese cruiser Ning Hai sunk in 1937 and that Yasoshima was a recycling of the Chinese cruiser Ping Hai also sunk in 1937
  • the four light cruisers built in 1942 and 1943 were intended as command ships for destroyer flotillas and could be described as heavy destroyers as opposed to light cruisers

Four heavy cruisers were sunk in 1942: Furutaka, Kako, Mikuma and Kinugasa. Eight were sunk in 1944 and four in 1945. Myoko and Takao survived the war.

Although 1932 clearly showed Japanese shipyards could produce it would be reasonable to expect one or perhaps two heavy cruisers per year. The Ibuki was started in April of 1942 and launched in May of 1943. She was never completed – the decision was made to convert her into a light aircraft carrier in December 1943. That work was suspended in March of 1945 in favor of construction of small submarines. A sister ship to Ibuki was started in June 1942 but then stopped in favor of work on the carrier Amagi. It is hard to understand why there were no more heavy cruisers produced after Tone in 1938 and Chikuma in 1939.

Even harder to understand is the huge gap in light cruisers – none produced  between 1925 and essentially 1943. As noted above, the ten light cruisers built in the 1940s were not really typical light cruisers so one could say construction stopped in 1925. Of 23 finished, three survived the war: Sakawa, Kashima and Kitakami. Two were sunk in 1942, 2 in 1943, 16 in 1944 and 4 in 1945.

Advertisements

More Japanese older cruisers

04 Thursday Aug 2016

Posted by silverwolfwushu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

battle of Cape Esperance, protected cruisers

American losses at the Battle of Savo Island were high: heavy cruisers Canberra, Vincennes, Astoria and Quincy were sunk and Chicago was under repair until January 1943. Of the destroyers Ralph Talbot was under repair in the U.S. until November 1942 and Patterson was repaired locally.

At the battle of Cape Esperance (October 11 to 12) American heavy cruiser San Francisco (CA-38) and light cruiser Helena (CL-50) were undamaged; light cruiser Boise (CL-47) needed eight months of repairs, and heavy cruiser Salt Lake City (CA-25) needed four months of repairs. The destroyer Duncan (DD-485) was sunk and the destroyer Farenholt (DD-491) needed 5 months of repairs. Destroyers Buchanan (DD-484), Laffey (DD-459) and McCalla (DD-488) were not damaged.

On the Japanese ledger heavy cruiser Aoba was hit by up to forty 6-inch and 8-inch shells. The bridge was wrecked, the No. 2 turret was knocked out and the No. 3 turret destroyed. Other hits put four of the Aoba’s boilers off line. Admiral Goto was mortally wounded and 80 other crewmen were killed. Somehow, she made it back to Shortland and from there to Truk and Japan where repairs took four months.

Heavy cruiser Kinugasa took four hits but was able to fully participate in the bombardment of Henderson Field two days later.

Heavy cruiser Furutaka was sunk as was destroyer Fubuki. The next day destroyers Natsugumo and Murakumo were sunk by land-based planes while trying to assist the cruisers.

A victory for the Americans in most respects. The Japanese Navy could not afford to trade ship losses at anything close to a 1:1 ratio.

During the 1890s Japan built 20 protected cruisers. During the period 1900-1910 Japan built 13 more. None of these were useful during the war.

Japanese Navy Older Cruisers

03 Wednesday Aug 2016

Posted by silverwolfwushu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Japanese navy armored cruisers

A consideration for Admiral Mikawa after his impressive victory at the battle of Savo Island (August 8-9 1942)  was that there were no (zero) replacements afloat or under construction for his heavy cruisers. One might infer that the Imperial Japanese Navy planners did not consider heavy cruisers to be a useful asset, especially in terms of steel and fuel. Accordingly, perhaps losing one or more of his heavy cruisers in exchange for some or many American transports should have been indicated. He was not aware that American carriers would be beyond their attack range. He did have to consider how much ammunition his ships had left and what threats he might face from land-based planes. Before attacking the transports he would have had to fight the cruiser HMAS Australia (8 eight inch guns; at that point almost 20 years old; she did survive the war) and seven destroyers with his seven cruisers and one destroyer. Assuming all the Allied ships were sunk, the question would be how much ammunition remained to attack transports.

Armored cruisers (19th century; veterans of the 1905 Russo-Japanese war)

Asama – completed in 1899; by 1942 a stationary gunnery training ship at Shimonoseki.

Aso – a former Russian cruiser launched in 1908; sunk as a target in 1932.

Azuma – completed in 1900; stricken from the navy list, hulked, and disarmed in 1941. On 18 July 1945, she was badly damaged by US Navy aircraft attacking Yokosuka.

Iwate – completed in 1901; made into a stationary gun platform in the 1940s; bombed by US Navy aircraft attacking Kure on 24 July 1945.

Izumo – completed in 1900 (shown below at anchor in Shanghai 1937); on December 8 1941 at Shanghai sailors from Izumo captured the US river patrolboat USS Wake (PR-3; formerly USS Guam PG-43). Wake was the only US ship that surrendered during WWII.  Wake‘s history is a blog article in itself – she was transferred to the pro-Japanese Wang Jingwei regime; recaptured by the US Navy in 1945; transferred to the Nationalist forces in 1946; captured by the Communist forces in 1949 and served in the Chinese Navy for almost 15 years. Izumo assisted in the sinking of British gunboat HMS Peterel also on December 8.

On December 31, 1941, Izumo struck a mine in the Lingayen Gulf off the Philippines. She was towed to Hong Kong for repairs and returned to Japan in late 1943. Izumo was reclassified as a training ship for the Kure Naval District. She struck a mine in Hiroshima Bay April 9, 1945 and was eventually sunk when near-misses by US Navy aircraft sprang the ship’s seams on July 28, 1945.

Kasuga – originally built in Italy for Argentina in 1902, she was ultimately sold to Japan. Kasuga was hulked and disarmed in July 1942 and used as a floating barracks during WWII.  On 18 July 1945, she was badly damaged  by US Navy aircraft attacking Yokosuka. Kasuga eventually capsized at her mooring.

Nisshin – like Kasuga, she was originally built in Italy for Argentina in 1903, and ultimately sold to Japan. She became a training in 1927 and was sunk as a target ship in 1936. Her wreck was later re-floated and re-used as a target in 1942: towed by the battleship Mutsu, the wreck was shot at by the Yamato.

Tokiwa was completed in 1899 and converted to a minelayer in 1922. She supported several naval campaigns in 1941 and early 1942. Tokiwa was damaged by mines twice in 1945. Additional  damage by American aircraft forced Tokiwa’s crew was forced to beach her at the end of the war.

Yakumo was built in 1900 and by the 1920s was used as a training ship. She survived the war and was used as a repatriation vessel during 1946.

 

 

 

 

American aircraft carriers late 1942

02 Tuesday Aug 2016

Posted by silverwolfwushu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

United States Navy light carriers

By November 1942 in the southern Pacific the only surviving aircraft carrier is the Enterprise, although the repaired Saratoga will depart Pearl Harbor November 12 and was expected to arrive at Fiji on or about November 22. Saratoga stayed a week, took about five days to sail to Noumea (840 miles) and then had to be repaired for two more weeks. It would be about 1000 miles from Noumea to Guadalcanal.

When the Enterprise withdrew in May of 1943 the Saratoga was joined by HMS Victorious for almost three months until two new Essex class carriers departed Pearl Harbor. Since the Japanese had a four to two carrier advantage during this period it is difficult to understand why the Imperial Japanese Navy was not much more aggressive.

Fleet carriers to be delivered:

Essex (CV-9) – lead ship of the 24-member Essex class. She was commissioned in December 1942; had a rated speed of 33 knots and carried 80 to 90 aircraft. She sailed from Pearl Harbor in May 1943 and participated in airstrikes against Marcus Island at the end of August.

Yorktown (CV-10 renamed from Bonhomme Richard in honor of CV-5)  Commissioned April 15, 1943 and reached Pearl Harbor from Virginia on July 24. She joined Essex for the attack on Marcus Island and, later, the attack on Wake.

Intrepid (CV-11) – commissioned August 16 1943. She departed Norfolk December and arrived at Pearl Harbor 10 January 1944.

Hornet (CV-12 named in honor of CV-8) – commissioned November 29, 1943. She reached the Pacific frontlines in February 1944. By then American carrier supremacy was clear.

Light carriers to be delivered:

Independence (CVL-22) commissioned on 14 March 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser  Amsterdam (CL-59). She arrived at Pearl Harbor in July 1943 and joined Essex and Yorktown for the attack on Marcus Island and, later, the attack on Wake. All the ships in this class carried about 33 planes and had a rated speed of 32 knots.

Princeton (CVL-23) commissioned on 14 March 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Tallahassee (CL-61). She arrived at Pearl Harbor August 9, 1943.

Belleau Wood (CVL-24) commissioned on 31 March 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser  New Haven (CL-76). She arrived at Pearl Harbor July 24, 1943. During the Battle of the Philippine Sea (June 19-20 1944) Belleau Wood‘s planes sank the Japanese carrier Hiyo.

Cowpens (CVL-25) commissioned on 28 May 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Huntington (CL-77). She arrived at Pearl Harbor November 19, 1943.

Monterey (CVL-26) commissioned on 17 June 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Dayton (CL-78). She arrived at the Gilbert Islands in November 1943.

Langley (CVL-27; named in honor of CV-1) commissioned on 31 August 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Fargo (CL-85; later Crown Point). She arrived at Pearl Harbor December 1943.

Cabot (CVL-28) commissioned on 24 July 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Wilmington (CL-79). She arrived at Pearl Harbor December 2, 1943.

Bataan (CVL-29) commissioned on 17 November 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Buffalo (CL-99). She arrived at Pearl Harbor March 22, 1944.

San Jacinto (CVL-30) commissioned on 15 November 1943. She was originally started as the Cleveland class light cruiser Newark (CL-100; later Reprisal). She arrived at Pearl Harbor March 4, 1944.

Admiral Yamamoto was correct. 

 

 

 

Inventory

01 Monday Aug 2016

Posted by silverwolfwushu in Uncategorized

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Japanese battleships, US battleships

If Admirals Nimitz and Yamamoto wanted to raise the bets in the great game of Pacific Ocean supremacy Guadalcanal presented an opportunity for both sides. Effectively, the United States Navy had available two modern battleships, with an additional one being repaired and another due to arrive in late November as well as two older battleships.The older ships were:

Colorado (BB-45; commissioned 1923; 8 16 inch guns; 21 knots rated speed) and

Maryland (BB-46; a member of the Colorado class; commissioned 1921; 8 16 inch guns; 21 knots rated speed).

Colorado and Maryland were near Fiji by mid-November – 1200 miles east of Guadalcanal. Presumably, held in reserve because of concerns about their speed and armor. 

The newer battleships assigned to the Pacific were

North Carolina (BB-55; commissioned April 1941; 9 16 inch guns; 28 knots rated speed) had been torpedoed in September and was being repaired at Pearl Harbor.

Washington (BB-56; commissioned May 1941; member of the North Carolina class)

South Dakota (BB-57; commissioned March 1942; 9 16 inch guns; 27 knots rated speed)

Indiana (BB-58; commissioned March 1942; a member of the South Dakota class), acted as a replacement for the North Carolina, and arrived in late November of 1942.

Under construction were

Massachusetts (BB-59; commissioned March 1942; a member of the South Dakota class) but slated to be assigned to duty in the Atlantic in late 1942.

Alabama (BB-60; commissioned August 1942; a member of the South Dakota class) was also scheduled for Atlantic duty. She arrived in the Pacific in September of 1943.

Iowa (BB-61; commissioned February 1943; 9 16 inch guns; 33 knots rated speed)

New Jersey (BB-62; commissioned May 1943; a member of the Iowa class)

Missouri (BB-63 ; commissioned June 1944; a member of the Iowa class)

Wisconsin (BB-64; commissioned April 1944; a member of the Iowa class).

Illinois (BB-65) and Kentucky (BB-66) were both intended to be members of the Iowa class. Construction was started with expected completion in late 1945. Neither ship was completed. Five ships of the Montana class with 12 16 inch guns were designed but cancelled.

One may infer that other five older battleships like Wyoming (BB-32; by 1941 being used as a training ship); Arkansas (BB-33 and sister of Wyoming), New York (BB-34), Texas (BB-35), and Nevada (BB-36) were judged to have insufficient armor and speed. Note that Nevada was the first US battleship to have triple gun turrets and burn oil. Oklahoma (BB-37) was the sister of Nevada but was deemed too damaged to repair after Pearl Harbor. Pennsylvania (BB-38) was in dry dock and was damaged at Pearl Harbor, but was repaired by summer of 1942. Her sister ship Arizona (BB-39) was much less fortunate.

The three ships of the New Mexico class – New Mexico (BB-40), Mississippi (BB-41) and Idaho (BB-42) had all been built at the end of WWI and were judged to have insufficient armor and speed. 

Tennessee (BB-43) and her sister ship California (BB-44) were rebuilt after Pearl Harbor. Admiral Nimitz had a fuel problem: Tennessee and sister battleships and their escorts based in San Francisco were excluded from the Guadalcanal invasion task force because there were just seven oil tankers. Task Force 1, including its escorts, burned ten thousand barrels of oil per day = the total oil storage capacity of the Pacific theater at that time. A carrier task force needed almost as much, so the Navy had to choose whether to operate carriers or battleships.

Washington (BB-47) was a Colorado class ship that was cancelled in 1922.

West Virginia (BB-48) was also a Colorado class ship. She was raised after Pearl Harbor and returned to active duty in July 1944.

Note that six ships of the proposed South Dakota class (BB49-BB54) were cancelled in 1922.

Mississippi, Maryland, West Virginia, Tennessee, California and Pennsylvania all fought at the Battle of Surigao Strait.

Admiral Yamamoto had a much different problem: he had local superiority because he had available Hiei, Kirishima, Haruna, Kongo and Yamato with Musashi on the way (expected in 1943). But that was all in terms of battleships. He had the same problem as Admiral Nimitz – was there any use for the older battleships Fuso, Yamashiro, Ise, Hyuga, Nagato and Mutsu. Admiral Yamamoto faced much more limiting constraints on fuel and ammunition. He knew if the United States could avoid crushing defeats, America would out-build Japan, and the Japanese initiative would be lost.

It was clear to both sides that Japanese forces would have to destroy American aircraft carriers and neutralize the land-based planes at Henderson Field.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013

Categories

  • curriculum
  • Uncategorized

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy